Journal writing experience
Task 2b and Reflective Theory
Task 2c
I have combined Tasks 2b and 2c as I felt they were linked. I’m not comfortable with writing the Reflective Theory
task and post this to a public Wiki.
I’ve learnt that I’m terrified of the thought of academic writing.
For six weeks I have been teaching the ‘Jive’ dance to two
year six classes, (ages ten and eleven years) I have been given ‘carte blanche’ at this school
as to what topic or style of dance I choose to teach and have written my own lesson
plans for the term. I generally opt to
enhance the children’s topic and work cross curricular. Their topic was World
War II and the ‘Jive’ dance was the obvious choice along with recognised music
of the Glenn Miller Band.
I introduced the learning objective and success criteria and
explained clearly what they are working towards plus I demonstrated the
dance.
My objective was for the children to learn the dance in
couples and to experience social dancing in a formal manner. I was aware that there would be some objection from the boys and girls dancing together but I couldn’t understand why there were so
many objections..
I asked the children to partner up in
couples and I didn’t expect that only 10% were happy to do this. Some were repulsed at the thought of holding
hands with one another. I also realised
that there could have been cultural reasons for this behaviour.
Their behaviour changed, they were becoming noisy, loud,
boisterous and unruly.
I become concerned and unsure of my management behaviour ability as well
as feeling anxious at the thought of loosing control of 30 children in a room the size
of a classroom.
I set myself to find the solutions to resolve these issues.
At that time I had
read about Gibbs model for reflection and also Kolb’s learning cycle and learnt
that I had used a mix of both but models instinctively. I realised I became unaware at what point and
what stages they came into play or merged with one another. This was a complex mix. Is this Multiple Intelligences working? But through the reflective model and learning
cycle I eliminated the fact that the size of the class and the number of
students were not a contributing factor of their disruptive behaviour. Half my dance classes in a week are conducted in the
school hall and half are in a Cabin (classroom size) and it is only one class
out of the ten that I teach that is so disruptive. This class happen to be held in the Cabin. So why wasn’t my reflection and learning
cycle theory working with this class? This was
baffling me. With this particular class, the theories alone wasn't working for me. Did it mean that I hadn't grasped the theories therefore unable to correct the practise's?
Further research showed me that according to Piaget’s theory
of cognitive maturity, it was to do with the ability to think, for
this particular classes age. I concluded that this class had a large percentage of socially immature children. I started talking talk to them about formal dancing and in particular
ballroom dancing with children of the same age. Intuitively I asked for a couple to volunteer to demonstrate the Jive dance with one another. There were a few giggles and jeers to start with but seeing the demonstration, the children
began to accept that it was OK to dance with one another. This was such a break through! I was feeling
elated that by a number of trials around the Gibbs cycle of reflection plus an understanding of Piaget's theory
I recognised what wasn't working and why.
I recognised what wasn't working and why.
Piaget’s theory states that from age 11 years upwards
children become aware that they don’t just have a sense of self, they have become
aware that to move forward and get what they want, they have to accept and
recognise other people’s needs. This is
known as ‘formal operations’ stage
The results showed a conclusive break through in the
children’s understanding of formality and etiquette of social dance. I went onto introduce Kolb's learning cycle to the class unbeknown to them.
At the same time, I divide the children into smaller groups
to perform their steps, the children watching were asked to, analyse and
critique the lesson. I also set a written task for the children not taking part
in the class to write down what they observed about the children learning to
dance in the class as well as taking notes on the class content and objectives.
I concluded from the written tasks and observations how much
the children were enjoying the experience, they were smiling, were happy, they
had learnt to communicate with one another about dance steps, they were
dancing in time with the music. I read
these observations to the class. This encouraged the children to remain on
task, engaged, very enthusiastic and less inhibited, and more dancing in
couples.
I also learnt that each and every event and the facts
available to you changes your judgement and perspective on how to apply the
theories to gain resolve and solutions.
I look forward to your comments
Corinda,
ReplyDeleteI'm really happy you found a solution through reflection, this shows that your Professional Practice Degree course is directly linked to your teaching.
Corinda your reflective practice commentaries are very useful, specific to the professional workplace in which your are applying them and make use of theory that has been presented but also theory/models that you have found that help you think through the solutions. Getting 30 children to dance with one another sounds like just on e of the challenging things in your workplace - but your ability to think through the solutions using theory and practice is that academic style you are worried about. You have explained this process well and unpacked it for others. Feeding back your observations/analysis to the children was something that I am not sure we do enough of - I suppose it would be formative feedback in education terms - but it is an important tool for teaching.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your feedback Paula.
ReplyDelete